Skip to main content
Scout is a web server that runs AI agents for one or more brands. A person chats with an agent in the browser; the agent can hand work to coworkers that run unattended; a goals engine reviews progress on a schedule. Agents reach the outside world through connectors (Shopify, Google, DataForSEO, Firecrawl, GitHub and others), each of which a brand connects with its own credentials. Each session runs on the Claude Agent SDK by default. The tools a session holds are assembled per session from three things: who started it, which model route it runs on, and which connectors that brand has connected.

Who these pages are for

The operator

You run your own deployment. You set the host environment switches, the budgets in agent.config.json, and which harnesses exist at all.

The owner

You want to know, before you rely on it, exactly what an agent can and cannot do with your store, your ad accounts and your money.

The roles

The full tool list for each is on Tool permissions.

Rules every tool decision follows

A tool the operator did not enable is not registered at all. A tool that is described to the model but refuses when called is an invitation the model keeps accepting, so the code removes the tool instead. There are two deliberate exceptions, listed on the permissions page, where a tool stays registered and refuses.
A budget that is zero, negative, not a number, or unreadable is an error, never “unlimited”. A spend ledger that cannot be read stops the session rather than reading as empty.
Writes to the outside world (a store change, a commit, an email, a sheet) and spends above a threshold wait for a person to approve that specific call. Silence denies. Unattended runs have no one to ask, so the writes that need asking are not available to them.
Every session has a dollar cap and a turn cap. Every coworker run has its own. The model spend for the month has a cap per brand, and each paid connector has its own monthly cap in its own currency.
The code keeps two kinds of note: what was observed against the real service, with a date, and what is reasoned from documentation. These pages keep the same distinction. A passing test suite is evidence about the test fakes, not about the vendor.
These pages describe the code at the commit they were built from. Where a behaviour has never been exercised against the real service, the page says so.